Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO)

Preferred Citation

Mark Dickens, Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO), in Popular Controversies in World History: Investigating History’s Intriguing Questions, ed. Steven Laurence Danver, vol. 2 (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2011), 145–62.

Subjects

Full Citation Information

Permanent Identifiers

URI: http://syriaca.org/cbss/2CBF44BH Link to Syriaca.org web application Bibliographic Record.

URI: https://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/2CBF44BH Link to Zotero Bibliographic Record

URI: https://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/2CBF44BH Link to Zotero Bibliographic Record

Article

Title: Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO)

Author: Mark Dickens

URI: http://syriaca.org/cbss/2CBF44BH Link to Syriaca.org web application Bibliographic Record.

URI: https://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/2CBF44BH Link to Zotero Bibliographic Record

URI: https://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/2CBF44BH Link to Zotero Bibliographic Record

Publication

Title: Popular Controversies in World History: Investigating History’s Intriguing Questions

Editor: Steven Laurence Danver

Volume: 2

Place of Publication: Santa Barbara, California

Publisher: ABC-CLIO

Date of Publication: 2011

Pages: 145-162

Is this record complete?