Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO)

Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO)Syriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/2CBF44BH/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2024-08-15-04:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.MarkDickensNestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO)http://syriaca.org/cbss/2CBF44BHhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/2CBF44BHhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/2CBF44BHSteven LaurenceDanverPopular Controversies in World History: Investigating History’s Intriguing Questions2Santa Barbara, CaliforniaABC-CLIO2011145-162 Dickens, Mark. “Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO).” In Popular Controversies in World History: Investigating History’s Intriguing Questions, edited by Steven Laurence Danver, 2:145–62. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2011. Mark Dickens, Nestorius Did Not Intend to Argue That Christ Had a Dual Nature, but That View Became Labeled Nestorianism (PRO), in Popular Controversies in World History: Investigating History’s Intriguing Questions, ed. Steven Laurence Danver, vol. 2 (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2011), 145–62.ChristologyIV-VII CENestoriansNestoriusV CE