Logicising Ecclesiastical Conflicts: The Synod of Ḥenanīshō‘ II (775) and the Aristotelian Vogue among East Syrian ScholarsJournal of Eastern Christian StudiesSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/XM8EN686/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2024-08-15-04:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.VittorioBertiLogicising Ecclesiastical Conflicts: The Synod of Ḥenanīshō‘ II (775) and the Aristotelian Vogue among East Syrian Scholarshttp://syriaca.org/cbss/XM8EN686https://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/XM8EN686https://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/XM8EN686Journal of Eastern Christian Studies72:3-42020203-215The Synod of Ḥenanīshō‘ II (775 CE) was held at a moment of transition for the Church of the East during the first Abbassid age. The new ruling dynasty had moved the political heart of Islam from Hellenistic Syria into the native space of the Church of the East. The Christians of Iraq for the first time were placed at the centre of an empire that extended from the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean, from Arabia to Central Asia. In this context, the cultural competences required to administrate and structure such an empire, opened a political space in which East Syrian scholars could gain public legitimacy because of their literary and scientific skills. In this perspective, the strongly hellenizing attitude that Syriac Christian elites cultivated in their monasteries and schools since the 6th century, in particular the study of the Aristotelian logic, became one of the main ways of gaining not only social prestige outside the Church, but also ecclesiastical recognition and hegemony. This cultural dynamics could explain the application of an emphatic logical jargon in the text of the Synod of Ḥenanīshō‘ II. The ecclesiastical assembly electing him was held after a long vacancy of the patriarchal seat of Seleucia-Ctesiphon. Two main factions opposed each other. The text of the synod, handed down to us in the Synodicon Orientale, reflects a complex work of editing documents directed at settling contrasting ecclesiastical groups by a superimposed hermeneutical grid of logical matrix. This contribution aims to explain the meaning and relevance of this logical grid, by clarifying the strategy of the synod and presenting an example of a practical and political application of logical language and reasoning among Syriac speaking elites.
Berti, Vittorio. “Logicising Ecclesiastical Conflicts: The Synod of Ḥenanīshō‘ II (775) and the Aristotelian Vogue among East Syrian Scholars.” Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 72:3-4 (2020): 203–15.
Vittorio Berti, Logicising Ecclesiastical Conflicts: The Synod of Ḥenanīshō‘ II (775) and the Aristotelian Vogue among East Syrian Scholars,Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 72:3-4 (2020): 203–15.AristotleGreek philosophyHenanisho IINestoriansVII-XVIII CEVIII CEcouncilslogicpolemic