Why So Syrian? A Quantitative Bayesian Approach to the Perturbations of the Textual Flow in the Slavonic Recensions of the Pauline EpistlesSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/X8734BWA/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2024-08-15-04:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.BasilLouriéWhy So Syrian? A Quantitative Bayesian Approach to the Perturbations of the Textual Flow in the Slavonic Recensions of the Pauline Epistleshttp://syriaca.org/cbss/X8734BWAhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/X8734BWAhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/X8734BWAМатериалы по археологии и истории античного и средневекового Крыма. Выпуск 8 / Materials in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Crimea. Volume 8СевастопольНижневартовский государственный университет2016615-655Some “Oriental” impact on a very early recension of the Slavonic translation of the five Pauline epistles is demonstrated. The most natural interpretation of this fact is that the Greek originals used for the Slavonic translation were those widespread outside the borders of the ninth-century Byzantine Empire. Moreover, there are some traces of additional editing of the translations from Greek against some Syriac version(s), in the same manner as in roughly contemporaneous Melkite translations of the New Testament from Greek into Arabic. Both I (“Ancient”) and II (“Preslav”) recensions share the above features that, therefore, are to go back to their common archetype, that is, an even more “ancient” recension. Only the earliest Ethiopic version (EthGr) shows an affinity with the Slavonic material comparable to that of the Syriac material. This fact must be interpreted as an affinity of the early Slavonic version with Greek recensions that were circulating before the seventh-century Arab invasion.The quantitative method proposed in this paper is dedicated to comparison of two competing hypotheses concerning the textual flow of a highly contaminated tradition. The method has the following preconditions and limitations: (1) the total number of possible hypotheses must be previously reduced to two: that a specific source of contamination existed or not; (2) in the present (simplest) modification of the method, the hypothesis about the presence of a discussed source of contamination must additionally imply a high value of the signal-to-noise ratio (> 0.5), that is, that this hypothetical source, if it actually existed, was the major source of contaminations of a specific kind (defined above as “perturbations”).
Lourié, Basil. “Why So Syrian? A Quantitative Bayesian Approach to the Perturbations of the Textual Flow in the Slavonic Recensions of the Pauline Epistles.” In Материалы По Археологии и Истории Античного и Средневекового Крыма. Выпуск 8 / Materials in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Crimea. Volume 8, 615–55. Севастополь: Нижневартовский государственный университет, 2016.
Basil Lourié, Why So Syrian? A Quantitative Bayesian Approach to the Perturbations of the Textual Flow in the Slavonic Recensions of the Pauline Epistles, in Материалы По Археологии и Истории Античного и Средневекового Крыма. Выпуск 8 / Materials in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Crimea. Volume 8 (Севастополь: Нижневартовский государственный университет, 2016), 615–55.New TestamentPaulSyriac influence [Slavs]VII-XVIII CEtranslations from Syriactranslations into Slavonic