Nineveh vs. Israel: How the Christian Exegetes of the Book of Jonah Interpret Historical EventsБиблия и христианская древностьSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/TVZ3HIEM/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2024-08-15-04:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Sofya VladimirovnaFomichevaNineveh vs. Israel: How the Christian Exegetes of the Book of Jonah Interpret Historical Eventshttp://syriaca.org/cbss/TVZ3HIEMhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/TVZ3HIEMhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/TVZ3HIEMБиблия и христианская древность1 [13]202268-87Most Christian exegetes of the 1st–5th centuries in their interpretations of the Book of the Prophet Jonah concern the confrontation between Nineveh and Israel, interpreting it in such a way that the Ninevites are the prototype of the Gentiles who believed in Christ, while the Jews rejected Him. The present publication focuses on the question of whether the exegetes juxtapose this spiritual confrontation with real, military confrontation between the Ninevites and the Jews — Assyria’s conquest of the Northern Kingdom of Israel (722/721 BCE). In sum, only two exegetes of the 4th century — the Syrian theologian Ephraim the Syrian and the Greek exegete Theodore of Mopsuestia concern these historical events. It makes clear that two theologians in their interpretatio ns of the Book of the Prophet Jonah use a similar tool of historical exegesis, despite the difference in genres. However, two exegetes demonstrate an opposite approach to the historical events. For Ephraim, the destruction of the Northern Kingdom is a result of the wicked behavior of the Jews compared to the righteous repentance of the Ninevites. The Syriac exegete examine the conquest as an illustration of theology of supersessionism, according to which the pagan peoples replaced the chosen people of Jews. Unlike St. Ephraim the Syrian, the Greek theologian Theodore of Mopsuestia evaluate the Assyrian conquest of Israel very negatively, emphasizing that the Ninevites subsequently endure appropriate punishment for their sinful deeds. The paper attempts to present that such a difference in opinions could be a result of a different attitude of two theologians towards the Jews. St. Ephraim the Syrian interprets the biblical story of Jonah and the Ninevites within the framework of his sharp anti-Jewish polemics, while Theodore of Mopsuestia with his doctrine of «mitigated supersessionism» is distinguished by some sympathy for the Jews.
Fomicheva, Sofya Vladimirovna. “Nineveh vs. Israel: How the Christian Exegetes of the Book of Jonah Interpret Historical Events.” Библия и христианская древность 1 [13] (2022): 68–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2022.13.1.003.
Sofya Vladimirovna Fomicheva, Nineveh vs. Israel: How the Christian Exegetes of the Book of Jonah Interpret Historical Events,Библия и христианская древность 1 [13] (2022): 68–87, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2022.13.1.003.Antiochene schoolEphremIV CEIV-VII CEJewish-Christian relationsJonahNinevehOld TestamentTheodore of Mopsuestiaanti-Judaismexegesishymnographypoetrypolemic