Mc 16 dans les manuscrits arabes du Sinaï – Réflexions de méthode pour leur utilisation en critique textuelle. Diversité des versions, rubriques, langues sources, variantes fausses et vraiesCOMSt Bulletin 8.2 Special IssueSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/S6EU5Y7Q/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2025-05-20-05:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Jean G.ValentinMc 16 dans les manuscrits arabes du Sinaï – Réflexions de méthode pour leur utilisation en critique textuelle. Diversité des versions, rubriques, langues sources, variantes fausses et vraieshttp://syriaca.org/cbss/S6EU5Y7Qhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/S6EU5Y7Qhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/S6EU5Y7QClaireClivazMinaMonierDanBatoviciThe Transmission of Mark’s Endings in Different Traditions and Languages: Papers presented at the International Workshop, Lausanne, 2–3 June 2022HamburgComparative Oriental Manuscript Studies2023541-560COMSt Bulletin 8.2 Special IssueIn this contribution, we present Mark 16:9–20 as we read it in Arabic manuscripts of the library of the monastery of St Catherine (Sinai). The pericope is present in all those manuscripts. Yet, we note that in those of the first millennium, whose rubrics refer to the Jerusalem calendar, no reading of the pericope seems to be prescribed. Secondly, as to the text, except for the versions or families that H. Kashouh calls a, b and perhaps jA, the influence of the Syriac (and sometimes, especially for ms Sinai ar. 71, Christian Palestinian Aramaic) versions seems to be pervasive. Thirdly, we take the time to reflect about the method needed to study Arabic Gospel manuscripts: we try to make the difference between ʻfalseʼ and ʻrealʼ variants. The conclusion is that, even though there are many obstacles for the use of the Arabic Gospel versions in textual criticism, their history is very rich and deserves to be studied.
Valentin, Jean G. “Mc 16 Dans Les Manuscrits Arabes Du Sinaï – Réflexions de Méthode Pour Leur Utilisation En Critique Textuelle. Diversité Des Versions, Rubriques, Langues Sources, Variantes Fausses et Vraies.” In The Transmission of Mark’s Endings in Different Traditions and Languages: Papers Presented at the International Workshop, Lausanne, 2–3 June 2022, edited by Claire Clivaz, Mina Monier, and Dan Batovici, 541–60. COMSt Bulletin 8.2 Special Issue. Hamburg: Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies, 2023.
Jean G. Valentin, Mc 16 Dans Les Manuscrits Arabes Du Sinaï – Réflexions de Méthode Pour Leur Utilisation En Critique Textuelle. Diversité Des Versions, Rubriques, Langues Sources, Variantes Fausses et Vraies, in The Transmission of Mark’s Endings in Different Traditions and Languages: Papers Presented at the International Workshop, Lausanne, 2–3 June 2022, ed. Claire Clivaz, Mina Monier, and Dan Batovici, COMSt Bulletin 8.2 Special Issue (Hamburg: Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies, 2023), 541–60.