The Argument of Severus of Antioch on the Absurdity of Confessing Two Common Natures in Christ, the Reciprocal Argumentation of Johannes of Caesarea and the Monophysite-Chalcedonite Christological Debates of the VI–VII Centuries. Part 3Библия и христианская древностьSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/RCD8KN7F/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2024-08-15-04:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Oleg N.NogovitsinThe Argument of Severus of Antioch on the Absurdity of Confessing Two Common Natures in Christ, the Reciprocal Argumentation of Johannes of Caesarea and the Monophysite-Chalcedonite Christological Debates of the VI–VII Centuries. Part 3http://syriaca.org/cbss/RCD8KN7Fhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/RCD8KN7Fhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/RCD8KN7FБиблия и христианская древность3 [15]202269-103
Nogovitsin, Oleg N. “The Argument of Severus of Antioch on the Absurdity of Confessing Two Common Natures in Christ, the Reciprocal Argumentation of Johannes of Caesarea and the Monophysite-Chalcedonite Christological Debates of the VI–VII Centuries. Part 3.” Библия и христианская древность 3 [15] (2022): 69–103.
Oleg N. Nogovitsin, The Argument of Severus of Antioch on the Absurdity of Confessing Two Common Natures in Christ, the Reciprocal Argumentation of Johannes of Caesarea and the Monophysite-Chalcedonite Christological Debates of the VI–VII Centuries. Part 3,Библия и христианская древность 3 [15] (2022): 69–103.ChristologyIV-VII CEIncarnationMonophysitismSeverus of AntiochVI CEVII CEanti-Chalcedonianpolemic