Victor’s Preface in Codex Fuldensis and the Search for an “Old Latin” Diatessaron

Victor’s Preface in Codex Fuldensis and the Search for an “Old Latin” DiatessaronEarly ChristianitySyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/QXBNF2RV/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2025-05-20-05:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Nicholas J.ZolaVictor’s Preface in Codex Fuldensis and the Search for an “Old Latin” Diatessaronhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/QXBNF2RVhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/QXBNF2RVhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/QXBNF2RVEarly Christianity15:32024347-371Codex Fuldensis, commissioned by Victor of Capua in 546 CE, is the oldest complete extant version of Tatian's Diatessaron, a second-century harmonized gospel. The text of Fuldensis reads like Jerome's Vulgate, but its anonymous Vorlage has not survived. How did the Diatessaron come into Latin? Scholars have long posited a hypothetical »Old Latin« Diatessaron to connect the dots between Tatian, Fuldensis, and other Diatessaronic witnesses; however, my work preparing a new edition and translation of Fuldensis calls that conjecture into question. I argue that there is no need to posit a lost »Old Latin« Diatessaron to explain the data that we observe in Fuldensis. My study proceeds in two parts, each with special focus on the evidence provided by Victor's preface. The first part examines the alleged discrepancy between the beginning of Fuldensis (Luke 1:1-4) and its first capitulum (John 1:1-5), which I demonstrate is explicable without resorting to an »Old Latin« Diatessaron that began with John 1:1. The second part investigates Victor's purported »Vulgatization« of Fuldensis, which I demonstrate is unwarranted given his painstaking description of adding the Eusebian section and canon numbers to ensure textual orthodoxy, coupled with his total silence on what would have been the equally arduous task of conforming the entire narrative line by line to Jerome's Vulgate. What we find in Fuldensis is satisfactorily explained if Victor inherited a Vulgate harmony. Based on the clues from Victor's preface, I see no need for there ever to have been an »Old Latin« Diatessaron. Zola, Nicholas J. “Victor’s Preface in Codex Fuldensis and the Search for an ‘Old Latin’ Diatessaron.” Early Christianity 15:3 (2024): 347–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/ec-2024-0023. Nicholas J. Zola, Victor’s Preface in Codex Fuldensis and the Search for an ‘Old Latin’ Diatessaron, Early Christianity 15:3 (2024): 347–71, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/ec-2024-0023.