The Embryological Interpretation of Gen 2:7 and its Use in Dyophysite Christology

The Embryological Interpretation of Gen 2:7 and its Use in Dyophysite ChristologyZeitschrift für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient ChristianitySyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/KWU4WSTT/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2025-05-20-05:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.NathanTilleyThe Embryological Interpretation of Gen 2:7 and its Use in Dyophysite Christologyhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/KWU4WSTThttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/KWU4WSTThttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/KWU4WSTTZeitschrift für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity28:22024303-325This article traces the rise of the embryological interpretation of Gen 2:7 and how it came to provide arguments for <i>dyophysite </i>Christology. By the late 4th century, many Christian writers saw in the formation of Adam a depiction of the formation and ensoulment of a human embryo. Moreover, authors around the 5th century connected the embryological reading of Adam’s formation with the life of Christ in the womb. But in the 6th and 7th centuries, this interpretation of Gen 2:7 became controversial. Debates about Christ raised the stakes of disagreement over the time of human ensoulment, and embryological readings of Adam’s creation were caught up in these debates. In this context, East Syrian Babai the Great (551–628) deployed the embryological reading of Gen 2:7 against Christological rivals in defense of his theory of Christ’s delayed ensoulment in the womb. In doing so, he offers a biological account of Christ’s pre-ensouled life as a plant and zoophyte. But the connection between an embryological reading of Gen 2:7 and dyophysite Christology also prompted opponents to turn to exegetical strategies that excluded any analogy with delayed ensoulment. This article thus presents an example of how theological controversy and the history of science affected biblical exegesis. Tilley, Nathan. “The Embryological Interpretation of Gen 2:7 and Its Use in Dyophysite Christology.” Zeitschrift Für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity 28:2 (2024): 303–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/zac-2024-0011. Nathan Tilley, The Embryological Interpretation of Gen 2:7 and Its Use in Dyophysite Christology, Zeitschrift Für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity 28:2 (2024): 303–25, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/zac-2024-0011.