Russian Policy in the Patriarchate of Antioch from the 1840s to 1914: ‘Soft Power’ in Syria and Lebanon

Russian Policy in the Patriarchate of Antioch from the 1840s to 1914: ‘Soft Power’ in Syria and LebanonContemporary LevantSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/GYZR7VGL/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2024-08-15-04:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Lora A.GerdRussian Policy in the Patriarchate of Antioch from the 1840s to 1914: ‘Soft Power’ in Syria and Lebanonhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/GYZR7VGLhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/GYZR7VGLhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/GYZR7VGLContemporary Levant6:120219-23Syria and Lebanon occupied a special place in the competition of the nineteenth-century Great Powers in the Eastern Question. Having entered this struggle, the Russian state used its accustomed routes of influence through the Orthodox Church. This article argues that the traditional practice of sending donations without asking for reports on their usage did not work in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Diplomatic pressure combined with control over the money sent worked better. Confessional instruments of policy thus found new patterns in the age of nationalism. After the Crimean War, Russian imperialism was opposed to the Greek Great Idea in the Balkans and the Middle East; in Syria and Palestine Russian church policy was based on support for the Arabs. All methods of ‘soft power’ (the foundation of schools for the Arab population, attempts to (re)convert the Melkites to Orthodoxy, and gradual Arabisation of the high clergy of the Patriarchate of Antioch) were aimed at putting Syria and Lebanon under Russian control. Unlike in Palestine or Alexandria, this policy was successful: in the first decades of the nineteenth century the Arab Patriarchate of Antioch was completely financed by the Russian government. This article investigates whether the policy of Arabisation could have brought about stability in the region, and whether it really contributed to the realisation of the idea of Orthodox unification under Russian control. Gerd, Lora A. “Russian Policy in the Patriarchate of Antioch from the 1840s to 1914: ‘Soft Power’ in Syria and Lebanon.” Contemporary Levant 6:1 (2021): 9–23. Lora A. Gerd, Russian Policy in the Patriarchate of Antioch from the 1840s to 1914: ‘Soft Power’ in Syria and Lebanon, Contemporary Levant 6:1 (2021): 9–23.Arab ChristiansJacobitesLebanonMelkitesOttoman empireRussian OrthodoxWestern missionXIX CEXIX-XXI CEXX CEpolitics