<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Faut-il s’interdire de parler de miaphysisme? Quelques suggestions d’un historien intéressé à la géo-ecclésiologie de la période tardo-antique</title><title level="j">Cristianesimo nella storia</title><sponsor>Syriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portal</sponsor><funder>The National Endowment for the Humanities</funder><funder>The International Balzan Prize Foundation</funder><editor role="general" ref="http://syriaca.org/documentation/editors.xml#dmichelson">David A. Michelson</editor><editor role="creator" ref="https://www.zotero.org/cbsc_admin">cbsc_admin</editor><respStmt><resp>Record added to Zotero by</resp><name ref="https://www.zotero.org/cbsc_admin">cbsc_admin</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>Syriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portal</authority><idno type="URI">http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW/tei</idno><availability>
        <licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
            <p>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.</p>
        </licence>
    </availability><date>2024-08-15-04:00</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><p>Born digital.</p></sourceDesc></fileDesc><revisionDesc><change who="http://syriaca.org/documentation/editors.xml#autogenerated" when="2024-08-15-04:00">CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader><text><body><biblStruct type="journalArticle"><analytic><author><forename>Philippe</forename><surname>Blaudeau</surname></author><title level="a">Faut-il s’interdire de parler de miaphysisme? Quelques suggestions d’un historien intéressé à la géo-ecclésiologie de la période tardo-antique</title><idno type="URI">http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW</idno><idno type="URI">https://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/FSMMH9SW</idno><idno type="URI">https://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/FSMMH9SW</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Cristianesimo nella storia</title><biblScope unit="vol">37:1</biblScope><imprint><date>2016</date></imprint><biblScope unit="pp">7-18</biblScope></monogr><note type="abstract">The Christological dispute arose with the attempt to express the unity of the divinity and humanity in Christ in linguistic terms. As a result, those who opposed the dogmatic formulation of Chalcedon have been called Monophysites. The term is incorrect and misleading in this context. Since G. S. Assemani, scholars have tried to distinguish between real Monophysites, i.e. Eutychians, from those who held to the mia physis formula of Cyril of Alexandria. They are also called verbal Monophysites (A. Grillmeier), Diplophysites (C.D.G. Müller), or Henophysites (S.P. Brock). From the perspective of ecumenical dialogue the most acceptable term has proved to be Miaphysitism.</note></biblStruct><bibl type="formatted" subtype="bibliography" resp="https://www.zotero.org/styles/chicago-note-bibliography-17th-edition">
  Blaudeau, Philippe. “Faut-Il s’interdire de Parler de Miaphysisme? Quelques Suggestions d’un Historien Intéressé à La Géo-Ecclésiologie de La Période Tardo-Antique.” <title level="m">Cristianesimo Nella Storia</title> 37:1 (2016): 7–18.
</bibl><bibl type="formatted" subtype="coins" resp="https://www.zotero.org/styles/chicago-note-bibliography-17th-edition"><ptr target="url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;amp;ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fzotero.org%3A2&amp;amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;amp;rft.genre=article&amp;amp;rft.atitle=Faut-il%20s%E2%80%99interdire%20de%20parler%20de%20miaphysisme%3F%20Quelques%20suggestions%20d%E2%80%99un%20historien%20int%C3%A9ress%C3%A9%20%C3%A0%20la%20g%C3%A9o-eccl%C3%A9siologie%20de%20la%20p%C3%A9riode%20tardo-antique&amp;amp;rft.jtitle=Cristianesimo%20nella%20storia&amp;amp;rft.volume=37%3A1&amp;amp;rft.aufirst=Philippe&amp;amp;rft.aulast=Blaudeau&amp;amp;rft.au=Philippe%20Blaudeau&amp;amp;rft.date=2016&amp;amp;rft.pages=7-18&amp;amp;rft.spage=7&amp;amp;rft.epage=18"/></bibl><bibl type="formatted" subtype="citation" resp="https://www.zotero.org/styles/chicago-note-bibliography-17th-edition">Philippe Blaudeau, <title level="a">Faut-Il s’interdire de Parler de Miaphysisme? Quelques Suggestions d’un Historien Intéressé à La Géo-Ecclésiologie de La Période Tardo-Antique,</title> <title level="m">Cristianesimo Nella Storia</title> 37:1 (2016): 7–18.</bibl><listRelation><relation active="http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW" ref="dc:subject"><desc>Christology</desc></relation><relation active="http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW" ref="dc:subject"><desc>IV-VII CE</desc></relation><relation active="http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW" ref="dc:subject"><desc>Jacobites</desc></relation><relation active="http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW" ref="dc:subject"><desc>Monophysitism</desc></relation><relation active="http://syriaca.org/cbss/FSMMH9SW" ref="dc:subject"><desc>self-references</desc></relation></listRelation></body></text></TEI>