Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels

Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the GospelsInternational Journal of the Platonic TraditionSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/DFFKSRIS/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2024-08-15-04:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.John GrangerCookJulian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospelshttp://syriaca.org/cbss/DFFKSRIShttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/DFFKSRIShttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/DFFKSRISInternational Journal of the Platonic Tradition10:22016193-207Julian, in a Syriac fragment of his Contra Galilaeos, attacked the resurrection narratives in Matthew and Mark, because they were inconsistent with each other concerning the time of the arrival of the women to the tomb, the nature of the being they met in the tomb, and the women’s subsequent actions. Other texts in Syriac and Latin indicate the probability that Julian took over the substance of his argument from Porphyry. Cook, John Granger. “Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10:2 (2016): 193–207. John Granger Cook, Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10:2 (2016): 193–207.Greek philosophyIV-VII CEJesusJulianNew Testamentanti-Christianpolemicresurrectiontranslations from Greektranslations into Syriac