Eusebius of Caesarea’s or Eusebius of Emesa’s<i>Theophania</i>? Evidence from the Lemmata in<i>Vaticanus Graecus</i>1611Vigiliae ChristianaeSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/C4MDNZ7U/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2024-08-15-04:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.HolgerSzesnatEusebius of Caesarea’s or Eusebius of Emesa’s<i>Theophania</i>? Evidence from the Lemmata in<i>Vaticanus Graecus</i>1611http://syriaca.org/cbss/C4MDNZ7Uhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/C4MDNZ7Uhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/C4MDNZ7UVigiliae Christianae73:52019507-515This paper is a response to Alice
Whealey’s proposal concerning the authorship of certain fragments traditionally
assigned to Eusebius of Caesarea, arguing that they are more likely the work of
his pupil, Eusebius of Emesa. The paper considers the manuscript evidence,
specifically the lemmata in Vat.gr. 1611, in relation to the internal evidence
considered by Whealey.
Szesnat, Holger. “Eusebius of Caesarea’s or Eusebius of Emesa’sTheophania? Evidence from the Lemmata inVaticanus Graecus1611.” Vigiliae Christianae 73:5 (2019): 507–15.
Holger Szesnat, Eusebius of Caesarea’s or Eusebius of Emesa’sTheophania? Evidence from the Lemmata inVaticanus Graecus1611,” Vigiliae Christianae 73:5 (2019): 507–15.IV CEIV-VII CENemesius of Emesa