Zacchaeus and the Unripe Figs: A New Argument for the Original Language of Tatian’s DiatessaronNew Testament StudiesSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/ARIV5XGG/tei
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
2024-08-15-04:00
Born digital.
CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Ian N.MillsZacchaeus and the Unripe Figs: A New Argument for the Original Language of Tatian’s Diatessaronhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/ARIV5XGGhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/ARIV5XGGhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/ARIV5XGGNew Testament Studies66:22020208-227Did Tatian write his gospel in Greek or Syriac? Treatments of this most beleaguered crux in Diatessaronic studies have largely depended on a now defunct approach to the source material. The ‘New Perspective’ on Tatian’s Diatessaron wants for a new study of this old question. A problematic arrangement of textual data at Luke 19.4 offers unrecognised evidence that Tatian composed in Greek – namely, contradictory testimonia to the Syriac word for Zacchaeus’ ‘sycamore’ in Tatian’s gospel reflect different etymological translations of a distinctive, Greek textual variant.
Mills, Ian N. “Zacchaeus and the Unripe Figs: A New Argument for the Original Language of Tatian’s Diatessaron.” New Testament Studies 66:2 (2020): 208–27.
Ian N. Mills, Zacchaeus and the Unripe Figs: A New Argument for the Original Language of Tatian’s Diatessaron,New Testament Studies 66:2 (2020): 208–27.DiatessaronGospel of LukeI-III CEII CELk 19New TestamentTatian