Differenze teologiche tra la Vetus Syra e il Diatessaron

Differenze teologiche tra la Vetus Syra e il DiatessaronLiber AnnuusSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/ANBHJ8C3/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2024-08-15-04:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.GiovanniLenziDifferenze teologiche tra la Vetus Syra e il Diatessaronhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/ANBHJ8C3https://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/ANBHJ8C3https://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/ANBHJ8C3Liber Annuus562006133-178It is usually held that the Old Syriac Gospels depend upon the Diatessaron. In the present study the theological tendencies of the two versions are examined. Tatian stressed the virginity of Mary, introduced some Encratite variants, offered a Christology similar to Gnostic conceptions and was anti-Judaic. The translators of the Old Syriac Gospels stressed the relationship between Joseph and Jesus, introduced an important anti-Encratite variant, did not present any similarity with Gnostic ideas and were Jewish Christians. The conclusion is that the two versions were produced in two different communities and are independent of each other. Lenzi, Giovanni. “Differenze Teologiche Tra La Vetus Syra e Il Diatessaron.” Liber Annuus 56 (2006): 133–78. Giovanni Lenzi, Differenze Teologiche Tra La Vetus Syra e Il Diatessaron, Liber Annuus 56 (2006): 133–78.DiatessaronEncratismGospelsI-III CEII CENew TestamentOld Syriac GospelsTatianheterodoxy