De driedeling van het geestelijk leven bij Johannes van Apamea. Kritische kanttekeningen bij einige gangbare interpretaties

De driedeling van het geestelijk leven bij Johannes van Apamea. Kritische kanttekeningen bij einige gangbare interpretatiesHet Christelijk OostenSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference PortalThe National Endowment for the HumanitiesThe International Balzan Prize FoundationDavid A. Michelsoncbsc_adminRecord added to Zotero bycbsc_adminSyriaca.org: The Syriac Reference Portalhttp://syriaca.org/cbss/8GPLGVIA/tei

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

2024-08-15-04:00

Born digital.

CREATED: This bibl record was autogenerated from a Zotero record.Leovan LeijsenDe driedeling van het geestelijk leven bij Johannes van Apamea. Kritische kanttekeningen bij einige gangbare interpretatieshttp://syriaca.org/cbss/8GPLGVIAhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/a_comprehensive_bibliography_on_syriac_studies/items/8GPLGVIAhttps://www.zotero.org/groups/4861694/items/8GPLGVIAHet Christelijk Oosten51:3-41999213-240The tripartite division of spiritual life in the work of John of Apamea: Some critical remarks on some current interpretations The problem of the identity of John of Apamea is briefly described. The author indicates which works should be considered authentic. The tripartite division of man’s relation to God in the work of John of Apamea has been subject to several interpretations. The author discusses some of the current ones. Is the ‘order’ of pagranuta part of spriritual life (Hausherr), or should it be placed in the ‘order’ before spiritual life (Harb)? The author takes the part of Harb, although John of Apamea himself seems to leave room for Hausherr’s interpretation. Harb’s interpretation of the categories within pagranuta is also critisized. The tendency to view the whole oeuvre of John of Apamea in the light of his tripartite division of man’s relation to God is probably not correct; it is true for only one work, The Dialogue about the soul and the Passions. For John’s other works an interpretation by means of a dual partition seems to be more appropriate. For example, Hausherr’s interpretation of the order of the ruhanuta on the basis of the tripartite division as found in John’s Letters is not confirmed by the texts. John of Apamea’s perception of man’s relation to God is dynamic and not systematic. Leijsen, Leo van. “De Driedeling van Het Geestelijk Leven Bij Johannes van Apamea. Kritische Kanttekeningen Bij Einige Gangbare Interpretaties.” Het Christelijk Oosten 51:3-4 (1999): 213–40. Leo van Leijsen, De Driedeling van Het Geestelijk Leven Bij Johannes van Apamea. Kritische Kanttekeningen Bij Einige Gangbare Interpretaties, Het Christelijk Oosten 51:3-4 (1999): 213–40.IV-VII CEJohn of ApameaV CEmysticismspirituality